Topic
The verification standard
Page 5 of 15 — What counts as evidence for a supplier claim and what does not, how verification is revoked, and why it has never been for sale.
Messages — page 5 of 15
LC_MS_Lenaverification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted#vendor-verification · 2025-06-15batch_banditevidence is thin#other-peptides · 2025-06-16cold_pack_carlawe refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry#vendor-verification · 2025-06-16VialBotVerification log updated: CPC — evidence added, status unchanged.#reconstitution · 2025-06-18nausea_windowslightly off topic but how does a supplier get verification revoked#vendor-verification · 2025-06-19step_one_sianthe verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, not advice obviously#other-peptides · 2025-06-21dark_for_ten_daysis there a way to verify an address belongs to who you think it does#payments · 2025-06-23vat_on_importthats evidence#vendor-verification · 2025-06-26u100_patthe mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division#vendor-verification · 2025-06-26never_for_saleupdate from 24 months ago: GL Biochem added evidence and the entry now reflects it#vendor-verification · 2025-06-27VialBotVerification log updated: QYB — evidence added, status unchanged.#asia · 2025-06-27wrong_networknobody can verify an address belongs to who you think it does. that is the actual problem with all of this#payments · 2025-06-29secretagogue_sythe verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them#other-peptides · 2025-07-01turnaround_tamwhats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication#other-peptides · 2025-07-02stack_scepticverification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more#vendor-verification · 2025-07-02hydrate_hanaok so how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing#vendor-verification · 2025-07-02seven_five_sweetupdate from 19 months ago: Homopeptide added evidence and the entry now reflects it#vendor-verification · 2025-07-03vial_ledgerfollow up verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently#vendor-verification · 2025-07-03retention_timeverification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently#vendor-verification · 2025-07-03month_six_meright so is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation#vendor-verification · 2025-07-04tenpencethats evidence#vendor-verification · 2025-07-04sharps_bin_sidflagged means theres an open question, revoked means the answer came back badly#announcements · 2025-07-05meniscus_melwe refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry#vendor-verification · 2025-07-06vial_ledgerupdate from 12 months ago: GL Biochem added evidence and the entry now reflects it#vendor-verification · 2025-07-06new_here_natnobody can verify an address belongs to who you think it does. that is the actual problem with all of this#payments · 2025-07-06non_scale_winginger did nothing for me and worked for two other people here. thats where the evidence is at#side-effects · 2025-07-10triumph_watchslightly off topic but if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score#vendor-verification · 2025-07-10first_and_last_foura supplier certificate on its own is a starting point, not evidence. that is the whole reason the verification channel exists#coa-reading · 2025-07-11point_two_fivenot evidence on its own#coa-reading · 2025-07-12VialBotVerification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged.#reconstitution · 2025-07-14fridge_six_twowhats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication#other-peptides · 2025-07-15alcohol_hitsverification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more#vendor-verification · 2025-07-15gip_glp_gilthe scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult#other-peptides · 2025-07-16ms_ms_miranobody can verify an address belongs to who you think it does. that is the actual problem with all of this, someone check my…#payments · 2025-07-16evidence_or_notwhat actually counts as evidence for a verification#vendor-verification · 2025-07-17nausea_windowginger did nothing for me and worked for two other people here. thats where the evidence is at#side-effects · 2025-07-18tare_weightrevoked stays in the log#vendor-verification · 2025-07-19group_buy_gwenwe refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry#vendor-verification · 2025-07-20relabel_watchverification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more#vendor-verification · 2025-07-20eight_mmverification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently#vendor-verification · 2025-07-20power_cut_piahas verification ever been reinstated after a revocation#vendor-verification · 2025-07-21eight_mmthe mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division#vendor-verification · 2025-07-21triumph_watcha member in spain said their pharmacy price was lower than germany when they compared in 2024, and i cannot verify that#eu · 2025-07-21bpc_scepticthe mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division#vendor-verification · 2025-07-22lisbon_lotwe have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern#vendor-verification · 2025-07-22endotoxin_eda supplier certificate on its own is a starting point, not evidence. that is the whole reason the verification channel exists#coa-reading · 2025-07-24split_the_costright so we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern#vendor-verification · 2025-07-24split_the_costhas verification ever been reinstated after a revocation#vendor-verification · 2025-07-24typosquat_taythe PeptideMeter result that triggered it is in the verification log with a date on it#announcements · 2025-07-26see_a_clinicianupdate from 22 months ago: CPC added evidence and the entry now reflects it#vendor-verification · 2025-07-26electrolyte_elirefresh on evidence#vendor-verification · 2025-07-27shame_and_medsgenuine question the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult#other-peptides · 2025-07-28typosquat_taythats evidence#vendor-verification · 2025-07-28mg_per_mlupdate from 22 months ago: ERP added evidence and the entry now reflects it the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the…#vendor-verification · 2025-07-28first_month_fithe scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult#other-peptides · 2025-07-29VialBotVerification log updated: QSC — evidence added, status unchanged.#tirzepatide · 2025-07-30triumph_watchnot evidence on its own#coa-reading · 2025-07-31provincial_patgenuine question verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently#vendor-verification · 2025-08-01steady_state_suefollow up ginger did nothing for me and worked for two other people here. thats where the evidence is at#side-effects · 2025-08-02week_three_wallevidence is thin#other-peptides · 2025-08-03