back after 22 months, has anything actually been published since
#retatrutide 2025-07-09
Wednesday34 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- reading_the_pins — buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely 17:44
- reta_resting_hr — held at 2 for 23 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain 19:27
- ms_ms_mira — does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel 19:49
- ms_ms_mira — anyone stayed at 0.25 for months rather than climbing 19:51
- ms_ms_mira — VendorInvestigate came back 98.6 on one lot and 99.4 on the next from the same QST, both fine 19:53
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does
lost 34kg over 24 months at doses well under what the trials used
i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
quick one is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme
buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely
held mine ages
watching my heart rate
weights-monthly.csv
562 rows · not retained in the public archive
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
glucagon is the new bit
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
phase 2 only
research use only
triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right
*that should say weekly
low and slow
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
reconstituted the 10 vial to 4mg/ml specifically so i could take 2.5 without measuring crumbs
sorry to jump in did anyone come off because of the heart rate
💀1
smaller steps here
held at 2 for 23 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain
🧪5
whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2
[edited]the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel
⚠️13💀4
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
anyone stayed at 0.25 for months rather than climbing
❤️2
VendorInvestigate came back 98.6 on one lot and 99.4 on the next from the same QST, both fine
i said 8 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
no long term data
🧪3🎉4
how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use