GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, not advice obviously
#other-peptides 2025-07-12
- igf_one_ivy — anyone had a purity result under 99.2 on one of these 14:05
- ghk_gia — secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, i could be wrong 14:43
- tarpit_tam — is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones 15:00
- cat_on_the_tray — does anyone have a Janoshik result for a HJ BPC lot 15:05
- cat_on_the_tray — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support 15:12
coming back to this the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 23 months and never came back
anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 4 and had it stay clear
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
anyone had a purity result under 99.2 on one of these
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
rodent data only
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, i could be wrong
*that should say weekly
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
get it tested
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
did nothing for me
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a HJ BPC lot
one thing at a time
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
cant tell honestly
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
stacked, learned nothing
verification channel has some
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
*Medutest not the other one