does JEEP being verified mean my vial is fine
#vendor-verification 2026-04-11
Saturday34 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- customs_owl — does JEEP being verified mean my vial is fine 14:13
- customs_owl — is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation 14:24
- pinch_not_stretch — the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now 15:49
- VialBot — On this day 2 years ago this channel logged 99 messages. 16:01
- vik_verifies — coming back after 10 months, has the standard changed 17:57
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
👀6🎉10⚠️3
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
how does a supplier get verification revoked
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
for the archive two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
genuine question how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
refresh on evidence
👍2
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
💀6🙏15
slightly off topic but does a good result from Janoshik outweigh a bad one from PeptideMeter
On this day 2 years ago this channel logged 99 messages.
post the photos
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
lot number or nothing
both numbers go in
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
genuine question blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs, n of 1 obviously
slightly off topic but who decides, the mods or the room
🧪1👍1
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
coming back after 10 months, has the standard changed
👀16
blinded is better
🙏2
pattern not one result
coming back to this how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
[edited]18:53marrow.mod pinned a message to this channel
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
unrelated but i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
nothing gets deleted
log it either way