vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-01-19

Sunday19 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • triple_ag_tom — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 14:37
  • triple_ag_tom — slightly off topic but we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern 16:12
  • meniscus_mel — coming back to this what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 16:27
  • triple_ag_tom — update on the earlier thing update from 2 months ago: SWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it 16:36
IS

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

TA

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises

🧪4🤝8📈16
TA

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record, n of 1 obviously

TA

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

TA

slightly off topic but we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern

👍9🧪3

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

for the archive if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

MM

coming back to this what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

TA

update on the earlier thing update from 2 months ago: SWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it

TA

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers