nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, someone check my working
#vendor-verification 2025-01-20
- pinch_not_stretch — a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 18:35
- private_script_pri — does GL Biochem being verified mean my vial is fine 20:28
- acetate_ash — update from 7 months ago: BCH added evidence and the entry now reflects it, i could be wrong 22:08
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
does a good result from PeptideMeter outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
thats not evidence
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
does GL Biochem being verified mean my vial is fine
both numbers go in
coming back to this how many independent results does a supplier need
update from 7 months ago: BCH added evidence and the entry now reflects it, i could be wrong
thats evidence
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log