we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern, for what its worth
#vendor-verification 2025-01-17
Friday16 messages2 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vial_ledger — sorry to jump in we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 22:53
- luerlok — the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 22:56
- vial_ledger — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 23:10
- vial_ledger — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 23:11
- luerlok — while im here update from 9 months ago: WXT added evidence and the entry now reflects it 23:19
sorry to jump in we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
📈13👍12🔥1
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
thats not evidence
*that should say weekly
while im here update from 9 months ago: WXT added evidence and the entry now reflects it
right so a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
not a recommendation