anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
#retatrutide 2026-03-09
Monday43 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- per_mg_pete — right so did anyone come off because of the heart rate 17:48
- per_mg_pete — nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is 17:57
- adelaide_assay — came off at 34 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it, we shall see 20:09
- luerlok — anyone reconstituting 5 vials to 4 so the steps come out smaller 20:59
i said 2 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since
cant feel it honestly
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
right so did anyone come off because of the heart rate
🙏7🧊6🤝8
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
lot-log.csv
837 rows · not retained in the public archive
sorry to jump in how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use
watching my heart rate
janoshik-c-4402.pdf
2 pages · 755 KB · not retained in the public archive
TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule
[edited]the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
settled by month three
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
anyone stayed at 0.25 for months rather than climbing
stopped for 11 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
for the archive energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
research use only
im at 1.7 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
sat at 2.4 for 9 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up, still working it out
Inter-lab diff for lot H-2814: 98.6% vs 99.4%. Within expected range.
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
reconstituted the 10 vial to 4mg/ml specifically so i could take 12 without measuring crumbs
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
[edited]the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me, from memory
smaller steps here
anyone logging resting heart rate on this
low and slow
🙏1👍11🔥11
i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
came off at 34 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it, we shall see
✅5❤️3
my resting rate went up 2 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 11
held mine ages
👍4✅9📈3
no long term data
buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely
coming back to this the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
phase 2 only
no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom
anyone reconstituting 5 vials to 4 so the steps come out smaller
💀8
my resting heart rate is up about 7 bpm, did that settle for anyone
triple agonist yeah
TRIUMPH is phase 3