how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
#other-peptides 2026-04-10
- VialBot — Verification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged. 22:46
- gradient_greg — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else 23:41
- gradient_greg — i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, thats one data point came back after 10 months off and my baseline was… 23:46
ran TB-500 alone for 32 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
right so anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
unrelated but secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
i stacked three things for 4 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, thats just me
sorry to jump in purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 98.1 on another
update on the earlier thing is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
follow up tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
one thing at a time
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
ran TB-500 alone for 8 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
get it tested
Verification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged.
coming back to this people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees, for what its worth
[edited]placebo maybe
sceptical but curious
Verification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged.
ran it alone
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
stacked, learned nothing
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
no human data
coming back to this how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
did nothing for me
[edited]evidence is thin
anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
*Janoshik not the other one
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
cant tell honestly
quick one the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
verification channel has some
came back after 17 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
while im here oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
reconstituted 15 in 0.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, thats one data point
PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
baseline month helped
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
for the archive is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
injuries heal anyway
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, thats one data point
came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
*that should say weekly
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it