cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees
#other-peptides 2026-04-09
Thursday39 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vial_ledger — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 22:45
- bpc_sceptic — update on the earlier thing the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 10 months and never came back, your mileage will differ 22:57
- sarcopenia_sam — the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy 23:17
- sarcopenia_sam — anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline 23:27
ran it alone
ran TB-500 alone for 32 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
placebo maybe
Channel stats, last 30 days: 112 messages from 17 members.
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
📉13😂7
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
stacked, learned nothing
coming back to this does anyone have a Janoshik result for a QYB BPC lot
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
one thing at a time
😂2🔥1💀14
update on the earlier thing the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 10 months and never came back, your mileage will differ
👍9🧪1📉6
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
injuries heal anyway
ran one thing at a time for 8 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
reconstituted 40 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
right so purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 99.2 on another
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, from memory
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
📉12👍1
follow up does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
cant tell honestly
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
🧪2📉15😂9
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, take that with a pinch of salt
no human data
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
TB-500 did nothing for me over 31 weeks and i stand by that a year later
👍1⚠️3📉3
VendorInvestigate came back 98.6 on a HJ lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
did nothing for me
evidence is thin
😂2🧪7🎉18
sceptical but curious
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks