no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
#other-peptides 2026-04-11
Saturday41 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- surpass_two — ran GHK-Cu for 3 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, happy to be corrected 18:15
- underfill_uma — for the archive Janoshik came back 99.4 on a MKM lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 19:08
- fasting_insulin — whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all 21:24
sceptical but curious
📉1❤️1
anyone had a purity result under 99 on one of these
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
🙏4❤️1⚠️2
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, someone check my working
evidence is thin
coa-g-0641.pdf
1 page · 594 KB · not retained in the public archive
✅11🤝11🧊9
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
came back after 4 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, i think
ran GHK-Cu for 3 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, happy to be corrected
👍3🙏11
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
ok so how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
New independent result logged — SGN, lot A-2418, purity 99% (Janoshik).
genuine question the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
📈9
for the archive Janoshik came back 99.4 on a MKM lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
👍11🔥18
get it tested
cant tell honestly
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a BCH BPC lot
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
baseline month helped
placebo maybe
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
one thing at a time
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
🔥7
verification channel has some
reconstituted 10 in 0.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
*PeptideMeter not the other one
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 21 months and never came back
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 98.6 on another
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
✅2⚠️15
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring, n of 1 obviously
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
coming back to this BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing