vialroom

#other-peptides 2025-04-18

Friday34 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • turnaround_tam — GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting 20:04
  • turnaround_tam — ran TB-500 alone for 18 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, i have it written down somewhere 20:42
  • turnaround_tam — does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels 21:13
  • reship_rita — cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees 21:39
TT

GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting

7👀3

GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, i could be wrong

TT

secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening

TT

ran TB-500 alone for 18 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, i have it written down somewhere

18📈3🤝7
TT

does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels

🧊10😂5📈1

evidence is thin

anyone reconstituted a 30 vial of these to 10 and had it stay clear

back after 10 months, has any actual data landed on BPC

came back after 3 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, ymmv
PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on a QYB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

*PeptideMeter not the other one

WV

i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve

T5

TB-500 did nothing for me over 30 weeks and i stand by that a year later, not advice obviously

RR

cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees

❤️1🙏1😂5
AA

purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another, your mileage will differ

is stacking three things at once ever defensible

⚠️1👍1🎉1

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it, ill dig out the number

rodent data only

LN

the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 7 months and never came back

LN

the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support

LN

Janoshik came back 99 on a QSC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see

is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work

tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating

sceptical but curious