for the archive is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
❤️3
#other-peptides 2025-04-17
Thursday33 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- provincial_pat — does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy 21:14
- chaser_chris — is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything 21:15
- chaser_chris — i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included 21:21
- wrong_network — Medutest came back 97.4 on a WWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 22:49
- homa_ir_hugo — anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking 23:32
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
cant tell honestly
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
TB-500 did nothing for me over 23 weeks and i stand by that a year later
🔥2🙏4📉1
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
⚠️2🤝4
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 315 KB · not retained in the public archive
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
🎉6👀15
i stacked three things for 21 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, we shall see
🤝1
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
while im here ran TB-500 alone for 20 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
sceptical but curious
rodent data only
right so GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
stacked, learned nothing
one thing at a time
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 25 months and never came back
i stacked three things for 12 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
reconstituted 5 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with, ymmv
get it tested
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, ill dig out the number
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
ran GHK-Cu for 15 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
how do people test purity on these, does Janoshik even take them
🧊2
Medutest came back 97.4 on a WWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
came back after 17 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
📉4🎉4❤️4