if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
#other-peptides 2025-04-19
Saturday44 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- amsterdam_aliquot — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 06:32
- lean_mass_lex — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 99.4 on another 08:01
- acetate_ash — whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all 11:51
- snac_and_water — people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this 12:36
- acetate_ash — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling 16:05
stacked, learned nothing
how do people test purity on these, does Janoshik even take them
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
baseline month helped
transit-times.csv
845 rows · not retained in the public archive
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
fridge-temps.csv
901 rows · not retained in the public archive
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
TB-500 did nothing for me over 24 weeks and i stand by that a year later
sorry to jump in i stacked three things for 18 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, from memory
[edited]the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, thats one data point
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
anyone had a purity result under 98.6 on one of these
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
one thing at a time
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 99.4 on another
📈13
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
injuries heal anyway
ran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
lot-log.csv
784 rows · not retained in the public archive
ok so the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
came back after 24 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
ran GHK-Cu for 18 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, take that with a pinch of salt
evidence is thin
🙏4👍4⚠️4
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, someone check my working
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
📈14🧪1
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, i could be wrong
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
amsterdam_aliquotran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them…
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
⚠️1💀8🎉14
get it tested
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, ask me again in a month
quick one GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
rodent data only
ran TB-500 alone for 23 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
verification channel has some
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
🧊3🧪4✅18
Purity check: no report on file for lot KP-0925. Nothing logged either way.