revoked stays in the log
#vendor-verification 2026-04-01
Wednesday29 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- brisbane_bac — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 17:05
- VialBot — Assay note: BCH lot H-2814 reported at 99% of label content. 17:28
- brisbane_bac — has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation 17:35
- brisbane_bac — how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing 18:04
- tga_notice — right so what actually counts as evidence for a verification 19:06
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
thats evidence
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
update from 16 months ago: WWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it, still working it out
[edited]follow up if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score, thats one data point
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
🧪9🎉15📈2
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
Assay note: BCH lot H-2814 reported at 99% of label content.
🎉7
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
📉2💀18🎉2
does a good result from PeptideMeter outweigh a bad one from Medutest
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, take that with a pinch of salt
how many independent results does a supplier need
ok so has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
🤝10🙏2🧪2
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
🙏4
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
🧊10🎉3
right so what actually counts as evidence for a verification
❤️18
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
[edited]we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, we shall see
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
not a recommendation