coming back to this we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
😂1🧊10
#vendor-verification 2026-02-08
Sunday15 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- sulphur_burp — coming back to this we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern 15:52
- unsolicited_dm — i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier 16:45
- sulphur_burp — while im here the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 16:53
- unsolicited_dm — the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now 17:06
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
how many independent results does a supplier need
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
lot number or nothing
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
🧪7❤️13🧊10
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
blinded is better
📉13🙏4
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
while im here the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
thats not evidence
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
does a good result from PeptideMeter outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
👀14⚠️18