we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
#vendor-verification 2026-01-09
Friday16 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- quiet.hours — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 09:29
- quiet.hours — somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log, not advice obviously 10:36
- quiet.hours — the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, someone check my working 11:27
- quiet.hours — the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line 12:20
- sgp_subq — update on the earlier thing does GL Biochem being verified mean my vial is fine 12:30
*Medutest not the other one
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log, not advice obviously
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, someone check my working
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
*Janoshik not the other one
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
refresh on evidence
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
update on the earlier thing does GL Biochem being verified mean my vial is fine
🤝6