two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
#vendor-verification 2025-08-17
Sunday22 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- gall_bladder_gav — we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, ask me again in a month 19:18
- VialBot — Archive lookup: amsterdam_aliquot first appears in this channel on 2024-11-30. 19:19
- vik_verifies — slightly off topic but the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not 19:27
- monoisotopic — do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones 19:44
unrelated but somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
pattern not one result
post the photos
never for sale
[edited]revoked stays in the log
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, ask me again in a month
Archive lookup: amsterdam_aliquot first appears in this channel on 2024-11-30.
🔥17
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
thin evidence
nothing gets deleted
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
slightly off topic but the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
🙏1👀10💀17
both numbers go in
log it either way
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
slightly off topic but verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
📉17👀10
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
thats evidence
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically