vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-08-16

Saturday21 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • retention_time — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises a lot number mismatch between the vial and the… 10:31
  • retention_time — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, thats one data point 10:34
  • knees_first — is there a version of the log i can read chronologically 12:25
RT

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, thats one data point

[edited]
janoshik-g-0641.pdf
2 pages · 97 KB · not retained in the public archive

for the archive what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

PP

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, happy to be corrected

KF

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more

KF

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

AA

i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier, i could be wrong

thin evidence

post the photos

🔥15😂1👍8

what actually counts as evidence for a verification

we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern

PP

the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line

[edited]