a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
#vendor-verification 2025-07-27
Sunday22 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- tallinn_taper — coming back to this if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 18:23
- electrolyte_eli — update from 1 months ago: SWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it 20:24
- osaka_assay — the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, take that with a pinch of salt 20:42
- osaka_assay — the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not, ill dig out the number 21:23
post the photos
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
coming back to this if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
thats evidence
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
refresh on evidence
log it either way
lot number or nothing
🙏10🤝14
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
nothing gets deleted
🔥1
update from 1 months ago: SWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it
weights-monthly.csv
168 rows · not retained in the public archive
both numbers go in
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, take that with a pinch of salt
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not, ill dig out the number
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
*Medutest not the other one