genuine question what actually counts as evidence for a verification
#vendor-verification 2025-07-26
Saturday13 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- see_a_clinician — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 18:15
- see_a_clinician — we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 18:38
- see_a_clinician — update from 22 months ago: CPC added evidence and the entry now reflects it 18:40
- see_a_clinician — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, not advice obviously 18:48
- VialBot — Purity check: no report on file for lot A-2418. Nothing logged either way. 18:54
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
thin evidence
🔥15
coming back to this is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
update from 22 months ago: CPC added evidence and the entry now reflects it
how does a supplier get verification revoked
never for sale
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, not advice obviously
📉7❤️4🧪1
Purity check: no report on file for lot A-2418. Nothing logged either way.
✅9🔥1
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically