vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-02-26

Wednesday15 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • chain_of_custody — if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log… 09:08
  • chain_of_custody — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 09:13
  • unsolicited_dm — does SGN being verified mean my vial is fine 11:08
  • seizure_letter — somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log, ask me again in a month 12:17
  • seizure_letter — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, ymmv 14:31
CO

if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

log it either way

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

🙏1🤝12📈2
CO

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

coming back to this blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

SL

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

thin evidence

is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation

SL

verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently

does a good result from Janoshik outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate

both numbers go in

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, ymmv

👀8