#vendor-verification 2024-11-21

update from 19 months ago: BCH added evidence and the entry now reflects it

pattern not one result

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more

Batch lookup SG-1177: 2 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-07-06.

i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count

a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

log it either way

we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern

the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

slightly off topic but i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier

does QYB being verified mean my vial is fine

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

never for sale

refresh on evidence

update on the earlier thing two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

what actually counts as evidence for a verification