update on the earlier thing a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
#vendor-verification 2024-11-18
Monday34 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- taper_tess — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, ask me again in a month 19:51
- pbs_pip — the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not, your mileage will differ 20:18
- comment_fatigue — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, take that with a pinch of salt 21:24
- vienna_vial — for the archive does CPC being verified mean my vial is fine 21:38
- vienna_vial — genuine question coming back after 24 months, has the standard changed 22:00
pattern not one result
lot number or nothing
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
quick one is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, ask me again in a month
🎉15👀7
blinded is better
not a recommendation
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not, your mileage will differ
🧊3❤️9
how many independent results does a supplier need
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
refresh on evidence
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
never for sale
nothing gets deleted
thats evidence
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
log it either way
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, take that with a pinch of salt
👀1⚠️6🧪4
for the archive does CPC being verified mean my vial is fine
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
Recon calculator: 40mg in 2ml = 5mg/ml.
genuine question coming back after 24 months, has the standard changed
🔥17
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
right so what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
thin evidence
both numbers go in
🧊17🔥6👍7
post the photos