the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
#vendor-verification 2024-11-01
Friday27 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- ring_size_down — how does a supplier get verification revoked the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not 22:53
- surpass_two — the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 23:07
- still_here_2024 — quick one if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 23:09
- still_here_2024 — i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier, for what its worth 23:11
- tenpence — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 23:25
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
never for sale
genuine question we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
blinded is better
nothing gets deleted
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
how does a supplier get verification revoked
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
refresh on evidence
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
[edited]do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
👀1
lot number or nothing
quick one if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier, for what its worth
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
pattern not one result
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
🧪11
unrelated but blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
not a recommendation
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
both numbers go in