the 2.5 to 5 step was the roughest one for me and everything after was easier, ill dig out the number
#tirzepatide 2025-10-08
- fake_tracking — the 2.5 to 5 step was the roughest one for me and everything after was easier, ill dig out the number 19:44
- fake_tracking — SURMOUNT was the weight programme and SURPASS was diabetes, thats the split people mix up 19:56
- oasis_ola — sorry to jump in plateaued at 29 weeks the same way i did on semaglutide, so i doubt its compound specific, ymmv 20:03
SURMOUNT was the weight programme and SURPASS was diabetes, thats the split people mix up
i went to 15 and came back to 10, more suppression wasnt more useful for me, for what its worth
no clean conversion
sorry to jump in plateaued at 29 weeks the same way i did on semaglutide, so i doubt its compound specific, ymmv
*Janoshik not the other one
restarted at 2.5 after 11 months off and the first two doses reminded me why titration exists
SURMOUNT-1 versus SURPASS-2, which one was the weight trial
start low anyway
did anybody switch back to semaglutide after trying this
GIP plus GLP-1
dual agonist, GIP as well as GLP-1, thats the whole difference in one line, i could be wrong
7.5 gang
there is no clean conversion between the two, anyone giving you a ratio is guessing
titrate slow
while im here coming off semaglutide, is there a conversion or do i restart at 2.5
is there a reason to titrate slower than the four week schedule
went back to semaglutide after 23 months because the cost difference mattered more than the GI
if youre coming off semaglutide the honest answer is start low and find out, theres no table
[edited]is 7.5 really the sweet spot or is that just channel folklore
at 15 the GI came back for me, so my easier profile claim only applies below that