is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
Thread · #test-results · 2024-09-07
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a
Spun off from a message in #test-results on 2024-09-07. 12 messages, 4 participants.
The message this came from
- noct.titrate — i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia, anyway 22:51
📈5👀6
selection bias
log the boring ones
😂1
certificate said 98.6 and the independent came back 99, is that a problem
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
👍17✅18
when did you buy it
my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more
my sheet has 9 lots from HJ with a spread under a point, which is tight
my sheet has 7 lots from BCH with a spread under a point, which is tight
my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more
🧪1🤝1
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones
[edited]