ok so whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next
#test-results 2026-06-30
- alt_ast_ali — while im here the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real 19:39
- noct.titrate — what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern 20:37
- noct.titrate — coming back after 21 months with a follow up result, where do i put it a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you 21:13
has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
while im here the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real
does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones
whats the lot
attach the pdf
one data point
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern
coming back after 21 months with a follow up result, where do i put it
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
log the lot number
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
99.2 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question