which lab
#test-results 2026-04-18
Saturday15 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- ms_ms_mira — anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial 23:22
- customs_owl — is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure 23:26
- customs_owl — follow up the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real, someone check my working 23:34
- tb500_tobias — right so i told JEEP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 23:42
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
🧪7👍16🔥15
one data point
lot bought purity assay/label
A-2418 2025-03 99.1% 9.6 / 10mg
A-2601 2025-08 98.7% 9.8 / 10mg
B-0114 2026-01 99.3% 9.4 / 10mg
B-0329 2026-04 98.9% 9.9 / 10mgis a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
[edited]🔥18🎉6🧊11
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
thats within range
how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier
follow up the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real, someone check my working
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
right so i told JEEP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them
log the boring ones
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1, still working it out