the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real
#test-results 2025-07-11
Friday12 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- blank_run — unrelated but sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm 18:10
- void_volume — update on the earlier thing the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier 18:13
- blank_run — the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, i could be wrong 18:19
- blank_run — if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1 a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached 18:42
unrelated but sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm
❤️5
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
update on the earlier thing the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
log the boring ones
💀6🔥17🧪13
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, i could be wrong
lot bought purity assay/label
A-2418 2025-03 99.1% 9.6 / 10mg
A-2601 2025-08 98.7% 9.8 / 10mg
B-0114 2026-01 99.3% 9.4 / 10mg
B-0329 2026-04 98.9% 9.9 / 10mg😂17👍7🧊6
coming back after 6 months with a follow up result, where do i put it
quick one weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
nice result
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached