vialroom

#semaglutide 2025-06-20

Friday45 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — Archive lookup: marrow.mod first appears in this channel on 2025-01-18. 20:45
  • marrow.mod — slightly off topic but was STEP 1 the one that ran to 68 weeks or am i mixing them up 21:02
  • slow.taper — right so SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and existing disease, not a weight trial 21:03
  • declared_value — what did SELECT actually measure, i see it quoted for everything 21:26
  • VialBot — Assay note: QYB lot SG-1177 reported at 98.1% of label content. 21:46
MM

i held at 15 for 4 months and it was the best decision i made

im 2 months in at 0.25 and the appetite effect faded, is that a thing
€120 a month for compounded against what brand costs locally is why most people here use vials

VB

Archive lookup: marrow.mod first appears in this channel on 2025-01-18.

MM

unrelated but went to 2.4 and the extra suppression wasnt worth the GI for me, so i came back down

back after 12 months off, do i restart at 0.25 or somewhere higher

did anybody find a difference between SGN and pharmacy at the same 2

my 5 vial in 0.5ml gives 8mg/ml so 12 lands on 12 units, thats why i picked that volume, not advice obviously

20:58marrow.mod pinned a message
MM

i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that, thats one data point

slightly off topic but was STEP 1 the one that ran to 68 weeks or am i mixing them up

😂13
ST

right so SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and existing disease, not a weight trial

🙏11🎉1🔥3
MM

how long did the first 5kg take for people at the low doses

how did people handle the jump from 1 to 1.7

give it four weeks

👀1
DV

lost about 10kg on the low doses before i even got to 1, which surprised me

what did SELECT actually measure, i see it quoted for everything

🧊5🎉6👀1
ST

genuine question if youre comparing brand to compounded, dose accuracy in the vial is the variable, not the molecule

VB

Inter-lab diff for lot H-2814: 98.1% vs 97.4%. Within expected range.

ST

restarted after 22 months off at a low dose and the nausea arrived exactly like the first time

VB

Assay note: QYB lot SG-1177 reported at 98.1% of label content.

VB

Channel stats, last 30 days: 47 messages from 36 members.

TT

half life is about a week so youre roughly four to five weeks to steady state on any new dose

ST

22 months at 2.4 and the honest summary is diminishing returns after the first half

ST

compounded and brand felt the same to me at 1, which is one person and nothing more

while im here anyone gone from 2.5 straight to 1 or is that too big a jump

the plateau hit me at 3 weeks and moved again about a month later without a dose change, take that with a pinch of salt

ST

seven days ish

coa-d-0718.pdf
1 page · 119 KB · not retained in the public archive

quick one dose day is sunday for me only because thats when i remember, not because sunday matters

[edited]
SO

£185 a month for compounded against what brand costs locally is why most people here use vials, i think
moving my dose day by a day or two never did anything noticeable for me

SO

went 1 to 1.7 too fast and spent two weeks regretting it, dropped back and repeated the step

KF

moving my dose day by a day or two never did anything noticeable for me

KF

i was wrong about the ceiling for a year, i thought 3 existed. it doesnt for the weight indication

ST

my dose day drifted from friday to sunday, does that reset anything