logging rhr daily
#retatrutide 2026-04-16
- vat_on_import — i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps 22:03
- nhs_pathway_nell — did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch 22:16
- rotate_the_site — stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again 22:22
- sorrel_sends — i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch 23:07
- triumph_watch — the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial 23:12
triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom, thats just me
lost 34kg over 1 months at doses well under what the trials used
slightly off topic but there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
research use only
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
no long term data
smaller steps here
TRIUMPH is phase 3
the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting
*PeptideMeter not the other one
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
held mine ages
Janoshik came back 99.2 on one lot and 98.1 on the next from the same CPC, both fine, take that with a pinch of salt
came off at 29 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual
slightly off topic but the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch
glucagon is the new bit
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan, ill dig out the number
settled by month three
watching my heart rate
mine went up too
[edited]i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
triple agonist yeah
anyone gone above 0.25 and what changed
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
low and slow
buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely
phase 2 only
cant feel it honestly
right so whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived, i could be wrong
stopped for 7 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
sat at 5 for 9 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
appetite suppression at 0.5 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point, take that with a pinch of salt
i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch
appetite suppression at 1 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point
my resting rate went up 4 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 26
genuine question is the GI worse than tirzepatide or about the same
the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
im at 10 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is