people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
#retatrutide 2025-11-30
Sunday17 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- net_peptide — the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here 18:11
- net_peptide — is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run 18:25
- triumph_watch — is the glucagon arm what people mean by the energy expenditure thing 18:39
- luerlok — my resting rate went up 8 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 15 phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout… 19:21
research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing, i have it written down somewhere
watching my heart rate
smaller steps here
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 912 KB · not retained in the public archive
phase 2 only
📉16🧪1🙏4
is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run
📈3
coming back to this there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists, ymmv
is the glucagon arm what people mean by the energy expenditure thing
📈2📉17🧊2
held mine ages
reconstituted the 40 vial to 2mg/ml specifically so i could take 15 without measuring crumbs
sat at 2.4 for 8 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
my resting rate went up 8 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 15
phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual
*PeptideMeter not the other one
the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial