came off at 4 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it, thats just me
#retatrutide 2025-09-12
- two_three_lifts — sorry to jump in i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps 09:38
- drawup_dee — my resting heart rate is up about 4 bpm, did that settle for anyone 09:40
- nausea_window — sat at 0.5 for 3 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up, i think held at 1.7 for 23 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant… 10:59
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan
phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual
[edited]sorry to jump in i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
phase 2 only
my resting heart rate is up about 4 bpm, did that settle for anyone
whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2
logging rhr daily
sat at 0.5 for 3 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up, i think
held at 1.7 for 23 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain
cant feel it honestly
buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely, take that with a pinch of salt
TRIUMPH is phase 3
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does
reconstituted the 40 vial to 8mg/ml specifically so i could take 12 without measuring crumbs, i think
triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right
genuine question TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule, take that with a pinch of salt
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
anyone reconstituting 10 vials to 10 so the steps come out smaller