anyone compared their VendorInvestigate purity across two different SGN lots
#retatrutide 2025-09-07
- taper_tess — research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing 19:28
- VialBot — On this day 5 years ago this channel logged 90 messages. 20:39
- ferritin_fay — blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect 21:02
- hair_month_four — anyone logging resting heart rate on this 21:54
- truncation_tru — quick one people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two 22:40
reconstituted the 5 vial to 5mg/ml specifically so i could take 5 without measuring crumbs
stopped for 3 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me
phase 2 only
settled by month three
TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule
stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does
no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data
research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
anyone stayed at 1.7 for months rather than climbing
phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan
is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope
TRIUMPH is phase 3
triple agonist yeah
slightly off topic but appetite suppression at 12 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point, thats one data point
im at 2.5 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
no long term data
i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch
mine went up too
smaller steps here
On this day 5 years ago this channel logged 90 messages.
while im here does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel
the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting, for what its worth
is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here, take that with a pinch of salt
watching my heart rate
cant feel it honestly
glucagon is the new bit
research use only
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
stepping in 5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
anyone logging resting heart rate on this
anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
my resting rate went up 2 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 7
sat at 5 for 8 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up, still working it out
is the glucagon arm what people mean by the energy expenditure thing
quick one people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial, from memory
ok so anyone reconstituting 40 vials to 10 so the steps come out smaller