research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
came off at 15 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
#retatrutide 2025-05-23
- step_one_sian — appetite suppression at 12 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point 18:51
- factory_direct_fi — whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2 19:07
- step_one_sian — the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here 19:39
- triumph_watch — VendorInvestigate came back 98.1 on one lot and 99 on the next from the same QST, both fine 20:49
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does
appetite suppression at 12 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2
held mine ages
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data
no long term data
my resting rate went up 4 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 25
low and slow
anyone compared their PeptideMeter purity across two different SWB lots
sat at 5 for 7 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
glucagon is the new bit
*Medutest not the other one
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom
settled by month three
VendorInvestigate came back 98.1 on one lot and 99 on the next from the same QST, both fine
triple agonist yeah
stepping in 2 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
how long before people saw the first change at 2.4