phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan
#retatrutide 2024-12-14
- tenpence — anyone compared their Janoshik purity across two different GL Biochem lots 17:40
- madrid_mg — held at 15 for 21 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain, we shall see 18:01
- maintenance_mo — Janoshik came back 97.4 on one lot and 99 on the next from the same QSC, both fine 20:22
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists, anyway
anyone compared their Janoshik purity across two different GL Biochem lots
anyone stayed at 0.5 for months rather than climbing
anyone reconstituting 20 vials to 10 so the steps come out smaller
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
mine went up too
held at 15 for 21 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain, we shall see
cant feel it honestly
phase 2 only
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
came off at 4 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it
stepping in 5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
watching my heart rate
for the archive my resting heart rate is up about 9 bpm, did that settle for anyone
triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history
settled by month three
lost 16kg over 4 months at doses well under what the trials used, your mileage will differ
the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does
stopped for 22 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
no long term data
glucagon is the new bit
how long before people saw the first change at 1
[edited]reconstituted the 2 vial to 2.5mg/ml specifically so i could take 7.5 without measuring crumbs
Janoshik came back 97.4 on one lot and 99 on the next from the same QSC, both fine
triple agonist yeah
research use only
research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
sat at 2.5 for 4 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me
appetite suppression at 0.25 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point
update on the earlier thing does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
On this day 7 years ago this channel logged 53 messages.