i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
[edited]#other-peptides 2026-06-07
Sunday63 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- apnoea_down_two — ran GHK-Cu for 23 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, ymmv 13:13
- acer_asks — unrelated but VendorInvestigate came back 99 on a TFC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 14:33
- electrolyte_eli — the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 8 months and never came back 14:34
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
for the archive i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
no human data
how do people test purity on these, does Medutest even take them
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
🔥11
cant tell honestly
fridge-temps.csv
933 rows · not retained in the public archive
ran GHK-Cu for 23 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, ymmv
🙏8👀12
evidence is thin
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
one thing at a time
anyone reconstituted a 30 vial of these to 10 and had it stay clear
*Janoshik not the other one
reconstituted 40 in 5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
📈2🧊5
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
rodent data only
while im here is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
[edited]ran TB-500 alone for 30 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 99 on another
📉3👍2💀4
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
genuine question anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
❤️2💀1🤝7
placebo maybe
[edited]👀3🙏1✅5
unrelated but VendorInvestigate came back 99 on a TFC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
💀12
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 8 months and never came back
🧊14
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 379 KB · not retained in the public archive
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
🙏8
came back after 20 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, for what its worth
while im here oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
injuries heal anyway
ran it alone
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it, for what its worth
*Janoshik not the other one
slightly off topic but no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
right so TB-500 did nothing for me over 28 weeks and i stand by that a year later
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
sorry to jump in does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a GGPeps BPC lot
did nothing for me
fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 339 KB · not retained in the public archive
while im here GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
stacked, learned nothing
anyone had a purity result under 98.1 on one of these
🧊12
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, i have it written down somewhere
janoshik-sg-1177.pdf
2 pages · 139 KB · not retained in the public archive
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
📉4
baseline month helped
sceptical but curious
chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 391 KB · not retained in the public archive
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
cant tell honestly
back after 25 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
verification channel has some
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
[edited]✅3
get it tested
sorry to jump in i stacked three things for 23 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing