PeptideMeter came back 99 on a TFC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
#other-peptides 2026-06-06
Saturday33 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- deadspace — PeptideMeter came back 99 on a TFC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 16:43
- LC_MS_Lena — secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening 17:27
- ring_size_down — is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones 17:53
- LC_MS_Lena — does anyone have a Medutest result for a GGPeps BPC lot 18:35
- LC_MS_Lena — TB-500 did nothing for me over 3 weeks and i stand by that a year later 19:10
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
evidence is thin
while im here reconstituted 30 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with, for what its worth
update on the earlier thing oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
🧊4📈15
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
ran GHK-Cu for 28 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
for the archive i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
*PeptideMeter not the other one
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
🧊6📈18
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
verification channel has some
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
TB-500 did nothing for me over 30 weeks and i stand by that a year later
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this, ask me again in a month
does anyone have a Medutest result for a GGPeps BPC lot
did nothing for me
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 4 months and never came back
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
TB-500 did nothing for me over 3 weeks and i stand by that a year later
😂5📈1
follow up the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
while im here the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see