is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
#other-peptides 2026-05-28
Thursday49 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- iris_imports — whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication 20:33
- wren_weighs_in — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, for what its worth 21:19
- per_mg_pete — nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing 21:29
- reed_reta — slightly off topic but does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s 21:52
- group_buy_gwen — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 23:01
ran it alone
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, someone check my working
Purity check: no report on file for lot C-4402. Nothing logged either way.
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
for the archive back after 8 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees
ran TB-500 alone for 18 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
one thing at a time
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
no human data
verification channel has some
Recon calculator: 5mg in 2.5ml = 5mg/ml.
did nothing for me
medutest-report-b-0114.pdf
3 pages · 440 KB · not retained in the public archive
😂1✅11
i stacked three things for 1 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
👍3💀1
sceptical but curious
ran GHK-Cu for 21 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, for what its worth
🔥14🧪3👀7
*Janoshik not the other one
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
😂4
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
👍7✅7📉15
reconstituted 20 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
rodent data only
🎉4⚠️1
Digest for the week of 2026-03-03 has been published.
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 98.6 on another
came back after 17 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, i could be wrong
slightly off topic but does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
⚠️5🧪5🤝4
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
baseline month helped
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
slightly off topic but no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
TB-500 did nothing for me over 31 weeks and i stand by that a year later
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
get it tested
cant tell honestly
unrelated but is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
VendorInvestigate came back 96.8 on a GL Biochem lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
[edited]🧊4😂3
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back