anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
#other-peptides 2026-05-27
- panel_before_after — is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent 13:40
- VialBot — Archive lookup: area_percent first appears in this channel on 2025-09-09. 14:16
- fridge_thermo — Janoshik came back 96.8 on a SSA lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 17:54
- relabel_watch — ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring 18:42
evidence is thin
cant tell honestly
one thing at a time
no human data
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
get it tested
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4 degrees
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
[edited]Archive lookup: area_percent first appears in this channel on 2025-09-09.
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this, i could be wrong
[edited]right so GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, thats one data point
injuries heal anyway
right so i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, thats one data point
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
reconstituted 30 in 3ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with, someone check my working
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
came back after 12 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
i stacked three things for 20 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 97.4 on another
stacked, learned nothing
follow up GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
Janoshik came back 96.8 on a SSA lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
ran TB-500 alone for 20 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
did nothing for me
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
[edited]rodent data only