anyone had a purity result under 99.2 on one of these
#other-peptides 2026-05-06
Wednesday41 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- tarpit_tam — for the archive tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling 21:53
- non_scale_win — are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway 22:27
- cold_pack_carla — Medutest came back 98.6 on a SSA lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 23:12
cant tell honestly
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
came back after 24 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
for the archive tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
📉4🎉5
no human data
ran GHK-Cu for 2 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
baseline month helped
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
for the archive does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
ran it alone
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
stacked, learned nothing
anyone reconstituted a 20 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
right so nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
coming back to this GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
back after 26 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees
sceptical but curious
💀2
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
one thing at a time
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, ill dig out the number
injuries heal anyway
verification channel has some
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 23 months and never came back
🔥5📈1👍3
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
placebo maybe
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
🎉3
Medutest came back 98.6 on a SSA lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
🙏7🧪3
*PeptideMeter not the other one
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
👀2
for the archive purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 98.1 on another, not advice obviously
ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring, happy to be corrected
🧊1
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support