i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, n of 1 obviously
#other-peptides 2026-05-05
Tuesday37 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- fake_tracking — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else 22:12
- VialBot — Batch lookup G-0641: 3 independent reports on file, earliest 2026-01-29. 22:24
- mg_per_ml — does anyone have a Medutest result for a FGP BPC lot 22:33
- fibre_first — anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 2.5 and had it stay clear 22:48
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
❤️4
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
injuries heal anyway
ran GHK-Cu for 21 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
ran it alone
ok so i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
did nothing for me
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
✅6🧪3💀2
get it tested
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
one thing at a time
ran TB-500 alone for 24 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
Batch lookup G-0641: 3 independent reports on file, earliest 2026-01-29.
cant tell honestly
does anyone have a Medutest result for a FGP BPC lot
i stacked three things for 17 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
rodent data only
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 2.5 and had it stay clear
🙏10
stacked, learned nothing
evidence is thin
baseline month helped
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
🤝4
unrelated but BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
update on the earlier thing people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
came back after 18 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, ask me again in a month
verification channel has some
⚠️1
sceptical but curious
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 97.4 on one lot and 98.1 on another
no human data
right so how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway