verification channel has some
#other-peptides 2026-03-22
Sunday19 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vale_vials — came back after 5 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, i have it written down somewhere changed my mind on stacking, i used to… 18:50
- warsaw_vial — sorry to jump in how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing 18:51
- vale_vials — right so i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 19:20
- warsaw_vial — does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see 20:10
came back after 5 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, i have it written down somewhere
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
📉15
sorry to jump in how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
👀17🎉1
no human data
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
get it tested
follow up how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
right so i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
🧊1🎉16
stacked, learned nothing
while im here whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
reconstituted 15 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
evidence is thin
one thing at a time
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
[edited]are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
did nothing for me
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
🧊2🤝5🧪6