GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
✅2🤝1
#other-peptides 2026-03-21
Saturday38 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- peak_split — is stacking three things at once ever defensible 14:30
- void_volume — are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway 14:53
- void_volume — came back after 19 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, ymmv 15:20
- nausea_window — the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult 16:47
- alt_ast_ali — tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating 17:39
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
❤️11🙏15🎉9
Medutest came back 99.2 on a WXT lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
ran it alone
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
while im here anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
[edited]are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
[edited]📉5😂13
sceptical but curious
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
came back after 19 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, ymmv
🤝1✅4👀13
verification channel has some
no human data
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
ran GHK-Cu for 14 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
stacked, learned nothing
🧊1📉4🙏5
rodent data only
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
ran one thing at a time for 4 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
ran TB-500 alone for 16 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
anyone had a purity result under 96.8 on one of these
one thing at a time
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, still working it out
👍1
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, for what its worth
*PeptideMeter not the other one
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
📈7👍3
get it tested
unrelated but my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time, still working it out
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
👀1
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 97.4 on one lot and 98.1 on another
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
🧊6😂2🎉11
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
back after 7 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
❤️1👍3🔥1
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 17 months and never came back
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
reconstituted 40 in 1.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
coa-b-0114.pdf
1 page · 168 KB · not retained in the public archive
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past