ran GHK-Cu for 27 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
🙏13
#other-peptides 2026-02-24
Tuesday13 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- slow.taper — ran GHK-Cu for 27 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind 21:37
- slow.taper — unrelated but secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, anyway 21:56
- dose_day_drift — quick one is stacking three things at once ever defensible one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 22:27
- VialBot — New independent result logged — ERP, lot G-0641, purity 97.4% (VendorInvestigate). 22:38
- nordic_price_nils — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, not advice obviously 22:41
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
unrelated but secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, anyway
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
back after 11 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
quick one is stacking three things at once ever defensible
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
came back after 17 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, still working it out
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
New independent result logged — ERP, lot G-0641, purity 97.4% (VendorInvestigate).
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, not advice obviously
🧪2
right so does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all