baseline month helped
#other-peptides 2026-02-22
Sunday32 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- relabel_watch — whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication 21:44
- relabel_watch — the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, someone check my working 21:45
- coa_or_cope — no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past, ill dig out the number 22:06
for the archive is stacking three things at once ever defensible
no human data
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
📉14📈15🤝1
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, someone check my working
📈1❤️6📉15
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
unrelated but Janoshik came back 98.1 on a QST lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
injuries heal anyway
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
🤝2
stacked, learned nothing
🎉5
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past, ill dig out the number
👍10✅4
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
evidence is thin
medutest-report-a-2601.pdf
3 pages · 427 KB · not retained in the public archive
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 464 KB · not retained in the public archive
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
🙏8
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
ran it alone
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
❤️1👀7
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a QST BPC lot
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
follow up ran GHK-Cu for 21 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
📉10
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
follow up people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
Verification log updated: SSA — evidence added, status unchanged.
right so the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
verification channel has some
placebo maybe
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same