nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, still working it out
#other-peptides 2026-02-07
Saturday61 messages14 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- month_six_me — tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating 18:02
- per_mg_pete — people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this, ill dig out the number 18:47
- sunday_shot — how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway 20:43
- rae_labels — Medutest came back 99.2 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 21:07
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
📈2🎉12⚠️11
verification channel has some
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
*that should say weekly
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
rodent data only
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
janoshik-e-2205.pdf
2 pages · 190 KB · not retained in the public archive
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
weights-monthly.csv
670 rows · not retained in the public archive
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a GL Biochem BPC lot
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
evidence is thin
fridge-temps.csv
279 rows · not retained in the public archive
one thing at a time
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this, ill dig out the number
📈18😂3❤️5
for the archive my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult, still working it out
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, n of 1 obviously
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
baseline month helped
injuries heal anyway
ran GHK-Cu for 31 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
cant tell honestly
💀14👍13
anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 8 and had it stay clear
🧪1
ok so changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, i could be wrong
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees
sceptical but curious
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
no human data
ran TB-500 alone for 8 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
did nothing for me
came back after 18 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
🤝1
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
ran GHK-Cu for 2 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
✅1📉10
stacked, learned nothing
reconstituted 20 in 0.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
*0.5ml sorry
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
i stacked three things for 26 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, n of 1 obviously
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
⚠️10🙏12
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
get it tested
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, n of 1 obviously
placebo maybe
🧪7
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
*Janoshik not the other one
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
📈5📉2
Medutest came back 99.2 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
📈6📉9
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
unrelated but took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
🧪12😂1
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
[edited]is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
reconstituted 20 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
💀3