i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
#other-peptides 2026-02-05
Thursday44 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- auckland_aliquot — whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all 18:48
- auckland_aliquot — people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this 18:55
- auckland_aliquot — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling 18:57
- first_and_last_four — genuine question Janoshik came back 99.2 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 19:00
did nothing for me
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
👍2👀17🎉2
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
🎉13🤝10
*Janoshik not the other one
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
🎉16⚠️15
genuine question Janoshik came back 99.2 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
baseline month helped
sorry to jump in oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, i have it written down somewhere
rodent data only
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
stacked, learned nothing
evidence is thin
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
cant tell honestly
back after 17 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
while im here nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
[edited]does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
one thing at a time
reconstituted 20 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, your mileage will differ
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a CPC BPC lot
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 12 months and never came back
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
sceptical but curious
no human data
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees
🧪1💀12
i stacked three things for 4 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
for the archive took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
while im here the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
ran one thing at a time for 7 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
ran one thing at a time for 2 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
ran it alone