people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
#other-peptides 2026-01-25
Sunday54 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- plateau_pen — is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent 16:21
- warsaw_vial — ok so is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring 16:47
- apnoea_down_two — cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees, from memory 17:32
- orfor_watch — does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s 19:06
no human data
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 96.8 on another
rodent data only
🧪2
16:20ferrous_ash pinned a message
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
👍17
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
Reminder set. I will post here in 3 days.
ok so is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
janoshik-b-0114.pdf
2 pages · 843 KB · not retained in the public archive
placebo maybe
verification channel has some
sorry to jump in took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
get it tested
medutest-report-b-0114.pdf
3 pages · 155 KB · not retained in the public archive
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
cant tell honestly
🤝2❤️17💀2
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees, from memory
📉13
one thing at a time
stacked, learned nothing
Recon calculator: 5mg in 1.5ml = 10mg/ml.
ran GHK-Cu for 20 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, ill dig out the number
🙏1
quick one ran one thing at a time for 8 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
sceptical but curious
❤️1🎉6
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
did nothing for me
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
[edited]genuine question secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
came back after 5 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
follow up i stacked three things for 11 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
🎉13📉10
ran TB-500 alone for 29 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a GGPeps BPC lot
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same, ask me again in a month
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, from memory
reconstituted 2 in 0.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
ran it alone
evidence is thin
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
injuries heal anyway
🧊17
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
👀5
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 24 months and never came back, thats one data point
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable, from memory
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
while im here is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones